Case Study

Running head : CITY EASEMENT UTILITY LINEThe remain slip of Mr . Jonesconstructing a subdivision overthe backup city utility program argumentationAbstractThe urban center has every rightly to retrieve its alleviation utility take out . It can also lead Mr . Jones to demolish the subdivision at his cost . The property possessor can at go around recover his payments from Mr . Jones finished a court of law , if not by vernacular agreement . The neighbor has no consider of damages on the basis of this episode . Since the matter comes below the jurisdiction of the res publica courts , rather than Federal courts , Mr . Jones has to defend his eluding , if needed through State courtsCase of Mr . JonesEasement of urban center Utility line is work by Mr . Jones subdivision . The city council has every right to period th e reflection of sub-division or for that matter to demolish the construction for recover the rilievo utility line for the public .

level turned the cost of such demolishing work has to be borne by Mr . Jones or the property owner as the City run-of-the-mine Utility Department has observed in some cases ( Holly , 2008The City is threatening to sue Mr . Jones for fraud against Municipality Mr . Jones can not be charged with an act of fraud . It is true ignorance of law is no excuse (Babstock , 2009 ) But , what Mr . Jones has done can be turn out as an unwitting act of ignorance of the fact that the City easement utitlit y line is under the constructed areaThe owne! r of the subdivision...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper